Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John Carter's avatar

Excellent stuff. Another factor in stagnation, I'd argue, is institutional. The organization of scientific bodies into large collaborations focused on obtaining federal research grants tends to discourage disruptive innovation, for a variety of reasons: no one wants to upset apple carts; bureaucrats more concerned with guaranteed results than speculative, high risk/high reward endeavors; collective action problems inside the collaborations. In many ways science becomes a social game, in which political specialists who are successful at navigating collaborations, obtaining grants, and getting their names onto 'high impact' papers, tend to outcompete the genuinely insightful.

One might almost wonder if this is all quite deliberate. A less innovative society is one in which the existing elite can more easily maintain its power.

Btw, there's a missing quote from Strauss, after "Strauss offers a striking account of the goals of the modern political philosophers:".

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts